Reed Switch Fuel Level Sensor, also called float fuel level senosr, it is done by sealed reed switches positioned inside the main shaft of the sensor. A float with built-in magnets then triggers the reed switch relays, generating a potential-signal with resistance, current, or voltage value that increases or decreases according to the fluid level, then give the signal to the gauge via wires, which shows the right level reading by pointer. In the whole reed switch level sensors,the float is the only moving part of the sensor,thereby minimizing potential mechanical failures to get the precision measurement. Reed Switch Fuel Level Sensor,Fuel Float Sensor,Fuel Tank Float Sensor,Float Level Sensor, Float fuel level sensor Xi'an Gavin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd , https://www.cngamicos.com
US-China solar photovoltaic enterprise "double anti-" first hearing
Seven solar panel manufacturers in the United States proposed an anti-dumping and countervailing duty ("double-reverse") application for Chinese PV companies. The first hearing was held in Washington, DC on November 9. It is learned that Suntech Power Co., Ltd., Trina Solar Limited and Yingli Green Energy Holdings Co., Ltd. have reached an agreement with four US solar panel assembly companies to jointly respond to the "double opposition" incident. Industry analysts believe that the cooperation between Chinese PV companies and US companies will help the Ministry of Commerce to re-examine the impact of the “double-reverse†investigation and bring a certain turn to the case. Chinese companies teamed up with US Sun Board to counterattack It is reported that Suntech, Trina Solar and Yingli have formed a new alliance with US solar panel installation companies Solar City Corp., Sungevity, Sun Run and Recurrent Energy. Coalitionfor Affordable Solar Energy . The alliance issued a statement saying that the plan "urges policy makers to provide solutions to the above trade disputes." Fan Ruifeng, director of communications at Trina Solar, said that the joint response of the relevant US companies is mainly to tell the industry that "double-reverse" is not good for some American companies. At this stage, they will jointly inform the outside world of the truth. The industry believes that “double-reverse†will lead to an increase in the cost of solar modules, and the US PV market will also be damaged. At the same time, the sales of Chinese PV companies will be hindered, which will also damage the export of US PV raw materials and equipment; hinder Chinese capital from entering the US solar market. Not conducive to promoting local employment. The US Steel Workers' Federation and dozens of US solar panel installation companies and other organizations also announced that they will support trade complaints filed by US solar panel manufacturers for Chinese PV companies last month. The US Solar Manufacturing Association has published a list of 75 other supporting companies and institutions on its website. The list includes small solar panel installation companies such as Renova Energy Corp. of California, CMA Solar LLC of New Jersey, and Chamber of Commerce in Hillsboro, Oregon. Xiaoxin, a researcher in the new energy industry of China Investment Consulting, said that an important step in China's PV industry's response to the US “double-reverse†investigation is to point out that this investigation is a harmful behavior. The counter-attack of Chinese PV companies and US companies has enhanced the persuasiveness of this view, which helps the US Department of Commerce to re-examine the impact of the “double-reverse†investigation and bring a certain turn to the case. In addition, under the organization of the China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Mechanical and Electrical Products, 14 Chinese PV companies will jointly defend the US “double opposition†and entrust the US Sidley Law Firm to act as an agent. The first hearing was not confirmed whether the four PV companies CSI Artes, Suntech, Trina, and Yingli participated in the first hearing in Washington, and made the first defense at the hearing. Cao Huabin, general manager of China Energy Conservation Solar Technology Co., Ltd. said that the number of US companies subsidizing the photovoltaic manufacturing industry and the coverage rate are no less than the Chinese government subsidies. In addition, many other countries and regions in the world have taken corresponding measures to stimulate local economic development and increase employment rates. From this point of view, the subsidy policies of the major western developed countries are more specific. Regarding the low price of photovoltaic products in China, Cao Huabin believes that this is not a malicious dumping, but because the oversupply makes the negotiating capacity of the demand side increase, and the squeeze of supplier profits is a pure market behavior; on the other hand, a large number of photovoltaic downstream components The manufacturing industry is a labor-intensive industry. The wages of Chinese industrial workers are much lower than those of the United States. Therefore, it is reasonable that the price of products is lower than that of the US market. As of press time, the filing of the “double-reverse†application has not yet been finalized. According to industry analysis, due to the collective appeal of 14 Chinese PV companies, whether the US has filed a case may delay the results for a few days. If the "double-reverse" is filed, whether the dumping behavior of Chinese PV companies is established is still pending after the International Trade Commission and the US Department of Commerce pass the questionnaire and field investigation. According to Xiao Han's analysis, the "double-reverse" investigation represents a formal confrontation between the US new energy industry and China's new energy industry, and has an important impact on the US follow-up policy. In the current economic downturn in the United States, the government has taken new energy as a key development direction and tends to protect the development of its own industry.