China uses 7% of the world's land to consume 30% of the world's fertilizers and pesticides. This kind of agricultural economy is difficult to maintain for a long time. It is imperative to promote environmentally friendly genetically modified crops. Excessively stringent approval and labeling systems deserve reflection â–¡ Fang Zhouzi About 30% of U.S. corn imported from China in 2013 was returned, and only 600,000 tons had been shipped back since mid-November, because national quality inspections detected from imports of U.S. corn cargo contained Mir162 genetically modified components. Mir162 insect-resistant transgenic corn is a relatively new breed developed by Syngenta. In 2008, it was approved by the US FDA as food and feed. In 2010, it was approved by the US Department of Agriculture for commercial planting. In 2009, it was approved by Taiwan, Brazil, and Australia as food. , 2010, Canada, Japan, Korea, Argentina, Mexico approved as food. In 2012, it was approved by the EU as food. However, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture has not yet approved the import of this insect-resistant GM maize, so it will be returned for shipment, which is not related to its safety. It can be expected that similar returns will happen. U.S. planted corn, transgenic varieties have reached 90%. Among these genetically modified varieties, the earlier planted varieties have been approved by the Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China and can be legally imported into China. However, the recent varieties have not yet gone through the approval process in China, causing problems. Why do Americans want to mix Mir162 corn, a species that does not meet China's requirements? Is it intentional? It may not be. The U.S. adopts a system that does not require labeling of genetically modified foods and equates it with conventional foods of the same type. Therefore, in the production, transportation, storage, processing and Other aspects, it will not bother to make distinctions. Various genetically modified varieties and non-genetically modified varieties It is normal for products to be mixed together. Why does the U.S. One of the main reasons why the United States opposes the mandatory labeling of genetically modified foods is that, if labeling is required, then genetically modified and non-genetically modified varieties must be distinguished at all stages of production, transportation, storage, and processing, thus increasing the cost. Ultimately, it should be passed on to consumers. Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined that genetically modified foods are virtually identical and equally safe to similar non-GM foods, there is no need to increase the cost to separate the two. Moreover, the forced identification of genetically modified foods will give consumers the wrong impression that genetically modified foods are not good or even harmful (otherwise why they must be specially labeled?), which is unfair to genetically modified foods. There are also a small number of Americans who do not eat genetically modified foods for various reasons. For example, they believe that GM foods are harmful to health because they believe in FDA, or believe that they do not eat “unnatural†foods. Can they have a choice? can. According to regulations, organic crops are only grown using traditional seeds, so organic foods certified as organic should theoretically not contain so-called genetically modified components. However, in reality, because of the prevalence of GM crops and genetically modified foods in the United States, it is difficult to ensure that organic foods will not be “polluted†by genetically modified foods. Therefore, in recent years, a private institution in the United States has also certified non-genetically modified organic foods that contain no genetically modified ingredients. This practice is recognized by the FDA because the FDA does not require mandatory identification of genetically modified foods, but it allows the voluntary labeling of genetically modified or non-genetically modified foods on the condition that it is not misleading, for example, it cannot claim that non-genetically modified foods are healthier. Organic foods are both expensive and of poor quality. They are selling panic and attacking competitors to sell themselves. In the past, the main opponent of organic food was conventional crop foods that used chemical fertilizers and chemical pesticides, and now they have become genetically modified foods. In recent years, the promotion of organic food in the United States has been quite successful. Sales have increased year by year, but the market share has remained at only 4%. For most Americans, it is a dispensable thing compared with genetically modified foods. Negligible: 70% of U.S. packaged foods contain genetically modified ingredients. Therefore, in recent years, organic food manufacturers have stepped up their efforts to attack GM foods. The strategy adopted is to protect the GM foods in the name of protecting consumers’ right to know. They are very clear that if the labeling of genetically modified foods is forced, not only will the cost of genetically modified foods increase, but because of the “harmful†implications of labeling, it will greatly affect the sales of genetically modified foods. This is what happened in Europe. In the 90s of last century, genetically modified foods were once popular in the European market, but after the European Union marked the genetically modified foods, genetically modified foods almost disappeared from the European market. Public opinion is consistent with science Therefore, under the support of organic food vendors, the United States has appeared in the grassroots movement to identify genetically modified foods and tried to overturn legislation by the FDA. In 2012, California became a testing ground. On the day of the election, the California voters voted whether or not to mandate the identification of GM foods. At the time, I was not optimistic about the results of the referendum. Although most Americans do not care about eating genetically modified foods themselves, most people think that the right to know is a good thing. There is no harm in one logo. The disadvantage of identifying genetically modified foods is that they need to be known through popular science and education. This is often difficult to achieve. The result was beyond my expectation. Of the more than 12 million voters who voted, 51.41% opposed the mandatory identification of genetically modified foods. The motion failed to pass. On the 2013 election day, the State of Washington also voted for a referendum on genetically modified foods. The result was 51.09% of the opposition. Organic food producers attributed this result to the fact that biotechnology companies and big supermarkets have invested a lot of money in advertisements against logos, more than the advertising costs they use to support logos. This is certainly one of the factors. However, organic food traders ignore that the mainstream scientific community is opposed to the identification of genetically modified foods. For example, both the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Medical Association have issued statements opposing the mandatory identification of genetically modified foods. This is the result of unanimous public opinion and science. China's "zero tolerance" system should reflect on The United States is the most advanced country in genetically modified technology, the largest producer of genetically modified crops and the largest consumer of the world. This is due to the loose US GM food policy. FDA does not even require the approval of GM crop foods (for GM animal foods requires compulsory approval), and it implements a "voluntary counseling" system. It is recommended that GM food developers should voluntarily submit materials to the FDA for advice. Until now, the FDA has completed more than 90 consultations on genetically modified crops for food and feed. It is also required to obtain approval from the U.S. Department of Agriculture before commercial planting (if the pest-containing components still require EPA approval). To date, 90% or more of the cotton, corn, soybean, and sugar beet grown in the United States are genetically modified. On the contrary, the approval of genetically modified crops in China is extremely cumbersome and strict. Regarding the planting area of ​​genetically modified crops, China ranks sixth in the world, but basically all of them are genetically modified cotton (in addition to genetically modified papaya), and none of the genetically modified varieties of important crops such as corn, soybeans, canola, and beets have been approved. Planting depends on imports. Since the approval of the cultivation of genetically modified cotton in the 1990s, China has no longer approved the cultivation of genetically modified varieties of important crops. Although the transgenic insect-resistant rice obtained a safety certificate in 2009, it has not been approved for planting. What is the reason that makes the Ministry of Agriculture so ineffective in this regard? Is it because of concern that once the GM crops are released, foreign seed companies will take the opportunity to occupy the market of GM crops in China? The history of planting GM cotton in China shows that this worry is not justified. In the 90s of the last century, even though Mengshan Company's genetically modified cotton varieties were popularized in China at the beginning, the domestically produced varieties soon sold Monsanto's varieties out of the market. On the contrary, due to the disapproval of the cultivation of genetically modified soybeans and genetically modified corn, it is now only possible to meet the needs of the domestic market by importing large quantities of raw materials from the United States, Argentina, and Brazil. China also implements the world’s most rigorous labeling system for genetically modified foods, the so-called “zero tolerance†system. For example, for edible oil produced from genetically modified soybeans, because it is an in-depth processed product, other countries implementing the labeling system for genetically modified foods do not require identification. China has asked for a label. Fortunately, there are few varieties and quantities of foods containing genetically-modified ingredients in the Chinese market. Basically, they are soybean oil, and they are all produced from raw materials imported from abroad. Management is relatively simple. If, like the United States, they grow large numbers of genetically modified crops, and genetically modified foods occupy the market, zero-tolerance labeling systems will be difficult to implement and costly to implement. China uses 7% of the world's land to consume 30% of the world's fertilizers and pesticides. This kind of agricultural economy is difficult to maintain for a long time. It is imperative to promote environmentally friendly genetically modified crops. In recent years, the central government has been stressing the need to promote the industrialization of genetically modified crops (for example, the Central Document No. 1 of 2010 stated: “continue to implement major new scientific and technological specialties for the cultivation of genetically modified organisms, and focus on the development of functional genes and biological innovations with important application value and independent intellectual property rights. Variety, based on scientific assessment and legal management, promote the industrialization of new varieties of genetically modified products.â€) In fact, this process of industrialization has been stagnant for many years, and the gap with the large countries of GM crops such as the United States, Argentina, Brazil and Canada is becoming increasingly Big. In addition to the irrational public opinion of the non-governmental opposition to genetically modified crops, is it too worthwhile to reflect on the excessively harsh approval and labeling system? (The author is a science writer and a doctor of biochemistry from Michigan State University, USA) We are high quality single handle Kitchen Faucet suppliers, the biggest advantage of the single handle kitchen faucet is that it is more convenient to clean the corners of the kitchen interior, as well as places that cannot be reached by ordinary faucets, expanding the cleaning area and bringing convenience to kitchen cleaning.We also have good quality Pull down kitchen faucet and high quality basin faucet. Single Handle Kitchen Faucet,Hot Sale Single Handle Kitchen Faucet,Good Quality Single Handle Kitchen Faucet kaiping aida sanitary ware technology co.,ltd , https://www.kpaidafaucets.com